Biaya
Setiap biaya yang dipungut protokol dan semua yang dibayarnya. Sebagian besar yang menyusul telah diputuskan dan didokumentasikan, tetapi belum dipungut maupun dibayarkan, dan tiap baris menyatakan mana yang mana — sebuah halaman biaya yang terbaca seolah semuanya sudah live akan menjadi jenis kekeliruan paling serius.
Hanya devnet. Setiap biaya adalah parameter tata kelola, tak pernah konstanta.
Yang Anda bayar
Tiga biaya, dan mereka tak jatuh pada pihak yang sama. Pembeli hanya membayar pada transaksi yang selesai dan tak membayar apa pun untuk membuka sengketa; merchant menanggung biaya permanen untuk beriklan dan diarbitrase.
Settlement fee
Dipungut hari ini- Pembayar
- Buyer
- Jumlah
- 0.85% of the traded amount, in the stablecoin traded
Deducted from the stablecoin released to the buyer, so it is paid only when a trade actually completes. It splits 40/30/20/10 across the development, ecosystem, infrastructure and emergency-reserve treasuries. This is the one fee the protocol charges today, and it has been proven end to end on devnet.
Ad-listing fee
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Pembayar
- Merchant, from their liquidity vault
- Jumlah
- 1 OPEN (proposed)
Not charged yet. The field exists on-chain and is read by no instruction, so publishing an advertisement currently costs nothing. If you are planning merchant economics, treat this as a cost that is coming rather than one you are paying.
Arbitration deposit
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Pembayar
- Merchant, from their liquidity vault — whoever opened the dispute
- Jumlah
- 20 OPEN (proposed)
Forfeited to the arbitration pool only if the outcome goes against the merchant; otherwise it returns to their vault. The asymmetry is deliberate: a buyer is often a one-time participant, and making them fund a deposit to be heard would price the dispute mechanism out of reach of the party it exists to protect. Not charged yet — stored on-chain, read by no instruction.
Yang diterima tiap peran
Konsumsi dan kompensasi adalah pertanyaan terpisah. Sebuah layanan dapat gratis dikonsumsi dan tetap dibayar oleh protokol — begitulah tepatnya biaya oracle bekerja.
Node operator
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Konsumen membayar
- —
- Penyedia menerima
- A protocol reward proportional to stake × connectivity × availability
A node bridging to Solana counts 1.0 against 0.4 for one only gossiping, because it does strictly more work and the difference is externally observable rather than self-reported. The calculation exists and nodes publish the liveness observations it runs on, but nothing submits the result and the rewards vault is empty — so no node has been paid.
Arbitrator
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Konsumen membayar
- —
- Penyedia menerima
- A share of the arbitration pool, pro-rata by revealed weight, for voting with consensus
Not built. Today voting costs transaction fees and returns nothing, while voting against consensus carries no penalty either — the incentive the commit-reveal design assumes is not yet in place.
Notification gateway
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Konsumen membayar
- Per delivery, by the participant who enabled notifications
- Penyedia menerima
- That fee
Not metered. Nothing counts deliveries, so nothing can be charged or paid. The mechanism to receive it exists; the meter in front of it does not.
Oracle provider
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Konsumen membayar
- Nothing — reads are free
- Penyedia menerima
- Paid by the protocol, scaled by currency coverage and uptime
Reads are free by decision, not by omission: a priced rate feed gets consulted less, which makes the median it contributes to thinner and easier to move. The provider is paid by the protocol instead, so the rate stays free at the point of use while its supply is still funded. The formula is proposed and not final, and nothing pays it yet.
Snapshot provider
Tak ada, berdasarkan keputusan- Konsumen membayar
- Nothing — downloads are free
- Penyedia menerima
- Nothing
No revenue, and none planned. Serving a snapshot is a marginal cost on infrastructure a node operator already runs and is already compensated for. Anyone weighing a standalone snapshot service should read this as: there is nothing to earn here.
Risk intelligence provider
Dispesifikasikan, belum aktif- Konsumen membayar
- Nothing directly
- Penyedia menerima
- From the treasury: a 1,000 USDC per month base, plus an amount scaling with the number of wallets processed, all scaled by uptime
The only permissioned role: a provider must be approved by governance before operating. Every other role is permissionless because a bad actor's cost is bounded — a useless oracle is outvoted by the median, a dead gateway simply fails to deliver. A standing subscription drawn from the treasury has no such bound, so gating who may receive it is the condition that lets a paid slot exist at all. Pay scales with wallets processed rather than nodes served, because one flagged wallet read by a thousand nodes is a single piece of work — and a wallet only counts when it was screened against real protocol activity, never because a provider chose to publish a record naming it. Neither the payment nor the approval gate is built yet.
Satu-satunya peran berizin
Intelijen risiko adalah satu-satunya peran yang memerlukan persetujuan tata kelola sebelum beroperasi. AllenHark adalah penyedia default.
Kunci layanan default
ALLENLMtV1zEAHT3xpVryqcbdPCB8c9JhM1Jdbe5XHg5
Setiap biaya adalah parameter
Tak ada nilai di sini yang berupa konstanta. Masing-masing dapat diperbarui lewat tata kelola, karena biaya yang didenominasi dalam sebuah token harus bergerak seiring harga token itu. Angka yang ditampilkan adalah default saat ini, dan yang ditandai sebagai diusulkan belum disetujui.